Kyle Wade Grove

Department of Linguistics
Cornell University
email: kwg33 "at" name-of-school "dot" edu
office: Morrill Hall,Computational Linguistics Lab

my picture


Activities

Competence, Processing, and Computation of:  Semantics, Syntax of the vP shell, Causatives, Unaccusatives and Unergatives, Ergative languages.  I have been working with John Hale on formalizing event structure for unaccusatives, unergatives, and directed motion constructions, and the implications this could have for explicating the processing difficulty of many garden-path constructions.  I have been classifying types of causation and transitivization, and how these types can be classified aspectually and thematically. 

I have been examining the processing assymmetry, first reported
by Stevenson and Merlo (1997):

Unergative reduced relatives:
"The horse raced past the barn fell"-DIFFICULT
Unaccusative reduced relatives:"The cookies baked in the oven have burnt". -EASY

My account is that the unaccusative case is the standard reduced relative, and that the unergative case is made difficult by a co-occurence restriction on the PP "past the barn".  In the unergative case, the intransitive directed motion construction exhibits an adjunct/argument ambiguity, attested in Zubizaretta and Oh (2007), and others, but the causative case is possible with only an argument attachment of PP.  Thus, in the unergative case PP ambiguity compounds the main clause ambiguity. 
This account avoids appeal to the lexicon and other strategy-based explanations, as the same causative head is implicated in the unaccusative case and in the unergative case (the directed motion construction).

My approach to causative morphology and semantics in the grammar is couched within the Distributed Morphology framework and the mildly context sensitive MG formalism (Stabler 1997).  I employ the Entropy Reduction Hypothesis (Hale 2006) as a modeling formalism for human sentence processing behavior.



Achievements

Why Unaccusatives Have It Easy: Reduced Relative Garden Path Effects and Verb Type.  Concordia Verb Concepts, Oct.2-4th. Montreal, CA, Concordia University.

Why Unergatives Have it Hard: Garden Path Asymmetries as Co-occurence Restrictions.  EALING Fall School, Sept. Paris, France

Crashproof Causation. with John Hale.  Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars,Carson-Newman College, TN.  Feb. 29, 2008.

Classifying Garden Path Constructions by Verb Type: WHy Unaccusatives Have it Easy. with John Hale. CUNY, UNC March 14th 2008.

Why Unergatives Select Themselves a Fake Reflexive and Unaccusatives Don't.  LSA 2008, Chicago
 
Why Unergatives Select Themselves a Fake Reflexive  MALC 2007, Kansas City, Oct 24 2007.

Why Unergatives Select Themselves a Fake Reflexive
Midwest Semantics Workshop, East Lansing, 6 Oct 2007.

States


MG-MCFG v. 0.8.  A CKY parser written in OCaML, uses the Guillamin compiler to translate MG to MCFG.  1.0 release to contain derived and derivation tree LaTeX output, entropy reduction computations.   


Accomplishments                       


Ergative Shift and Fake Reflexivity
in Review, Linguistic Analysis.          

Why Unergatives Select Themselves a Fake Reflexive  MALC Working Papers 2007.

Deriving Pairedness in vP Structure: Minimalist yet Optimal  with Mike Putnam.  in Review, Equinox Series.



Kyle Grove